Posts

PM Imperative 4: Organizational Alignment to Deliver the Offering

  In Imperative 1 we determined which markets the firm should deliberately choose to compete within. In Imperative 2 we identified and selected specific market segments that deserve focused strategic attention. In Imperative 3 we designed the product offering that best matches the needs of chosen segments. The next step is to ensure the organization can consistently deliver the offering that has been designed. Strategy becomes meaningful only when internal functions align around the same definition of customer value. For product managers this step requires sustained involvement beyond writing a strategy or offering document. We cannot define the offering perspective and then disengage expecting execution to naturally align itself. In cloud and deep technology products delivery depends heavily on engineering and architectural tradeoffs. These choices directly shape reliability, scalability, cost efficiency, and the overall delivered customer experience. Product managers ther...
Post a Comment
Read more

PM Imperative 3: The Product Offering as a Strategic System

In Marketing Imperative 2, we discussed the necessity of Segmentation. We established a painful but unavoidable truth: You cannot serve all customers equally well. Imperative 2 is about the courage to choose. It’s about deciding which customers matter, which "jobs" you will solve deeply, and—most importantly—which segments you are willing to ignore. But choosing a segment is only half the battle. Strategy without a tangible manifestation is just a slide deck. Once the segment is chosen, the question becomes: What is the specific "package" of value we are placing in front of them? This is Marketing Imperative 3: Designing the Product Offering. Strategy is Architectural, Not Just Analytical If Imperative 2 is analytical (choosing the "Who"), Imperative 3 is architectural (building the "What"). Most product failures happen in the gap between these two stages. A team identifies a specific segment, but then proceeds to build a generic product, hoping ...
Post a Comment
Read more

PM Imperative 2: Identify and Target Market Segments (Or: Why “knowing your customer” is not enough)

  Most companies fail at growth not because they don’t understand customers — but because they try to serve too many different customers with one answer . Marketing Imperative 2 forces a hard, uncomfortable question: Which customers are we actually building for? And just as importantly: Which customers are we explicitly not building for? This is not a tactical exercise. It’s a strategic one. The Illusion of “The Market” In any B2B or B2C market, customers do not have uniform needs. Yet many teams talk about “the market” as if it were a single entity: What does the market want? What will the market pay for? How do we win the market? This framing is dangerously misleading. A single offer aimed at the overall market may delight some customers — but it will usually underserve many others . Marketing Imperative 2 starts by rejecting the idea of a monolithic market and replacing it with something more precise: Market segments = groups of customers with sim...
Post a Comment
Read more

Imperative 1 : Determine which markets to address

  The Hardest Truth I Learned as a Product Leader: Market Choice Comes First It took me a long time to internalize this, and I didn't learn it from a framework or a book. The hardest truth I've learned as a product leader is this: The most important decision isn't what you build. It's where you choose to play. I used to believe that strong execution could compensate for almost anything. That if the team moved fast, shipped well, and built high-quality features, things would work out. Over time, I learned that execution only amplifies the choice you've already made. If the market choice is wrong, great execution just helps you get to the wrong place faster. I Thought Product Was About Building. It's Really About Choosing. What finally clicked for me was realizing that every company is quietly running a portfolio of bets, whether it admits it or not. At any point in time, the organization is implicitly deciding: Which new markets deserve real investment (people, t...
Post a Comment
Read more

PM imperatives

AI feels like magic for PMs. Everyone can build now. You can prototype an idea, vibecode your way and have something live quickly. But that doesn't mean we've created value. When tools get democratized, output explodes. Value doesn't. This brings us to the actual job of the PM: create value for customers and the business. The focus, as always, should be building something that solves a problem, gets adopted, and makes money. As a PM, you still have to have insights on the market, customers, and other alternatives. Your imperatives continue to remain the same: 1) Determine and recommend which markets to address, 2) Market segmentation and targeting, 3) Set strategic direction and positioning, 4) Design the marketing offer (Product, Price, Distribution, Promotion, Service), 5) Secure support from other functions, 6) Monitor and control execution and performance. As a PM, we ought to use AI to sharpen our decisions, not replace them.   In the series, I want to cover the fi...
Post a Comment
Read more